Rebellion of Machine Perfection

Rebellion of Machine Perfection
Photo by Laura Rivera / Unsplash
Machines scroll among us.

Whilst on Threads recently, I saw a post by Ghost creator, John O'Nolan, wondering why a TikTok trend saw users intentionally miming audio out of sync. The reply, by Robert Stephens, inspired this blog.

John O’Nolan (@johnonolan) on Threads
I assume this makes me seem old and out of touch - but what’s with tiktok people miming songs but the video and the audio is like 1-2seconds out of time? It seems to be everyone, even people with millions of followers, so I assume it’s an intentional/stylistic thing? But why? Feeling like “old man shouts at a kid filming video in portrait mode circa 2012” with this Q

Stephens suggested that the reason why this has become a trend is because it is a rebellion against the perfection we so often see in this digital age and an attempt to make the space feel more imperfectly human. Stephens refers to this as "Proof of work".

Proof of work on micro-blogging social media

Whilst TikTok is leading the game in video content, which allows a user to often see the person behind the camera, on micro-blogging platforms things are different.

An account can have a face, a series of interesting posts, genuine looking engagement, and still be a machine.

The saying goes "see it to believe it", well on many social platforms you can't 'see it'. Profiles and what they post are very hard to discern from AI driven bot accounts, told to act like real humans, whilst often promoting a certain agenda.

So, should we start taking every interaction we see from a stranger on social media with a pinch of salt? Maybe. You can't even trust 'verification' on many platforms now.

But what we can look for are the imperfections - the spelling mistakes, typos, edited posts, deleted posts - the things that make us human.

Should we alter our behaviour?

The power of humanity is our adaptability. We can quickly change how we interact with the world depending on circumstance and context.

But by changing our behaviour to be more imperfect, it's almost certain the AI models will too. ChatGPT is already putting protections in place to prevent the "ignore previous instruction" embarrassment.

OpenAI’s latest model will block the ‘ignore all previous instructions’ loophole
OpenAI’s newest model, GPT-4o Mini, includes a new safety mechanism to prevent hackers from overriding chatbots.

We also deserve better than that. Humanity has created seemingly perfect things throughout our history - think the pyramids, the Sistine Chapel, Toblerone chocolate, even something as simple as a watch. Things that have inspired religion and faith well before any AI models came about.

True, a social profile which documents the life of a lettuce may not inspire faith, but it's human perfection in its own way - in a way no AI could predict. We don't want them to predict it either; it's no fun if a machine that can't laugh comes up with the jokes.

What we really need, are better laws and regulations on the use of AI and bots - particularly in online social spaces.

In reality, we need to address if these kind of automated accounts should be on online social spaces. It's hardly the vision of a human connected internet that social media was imagined to be.

I'm hoping that if we acknowledge and work alongside bots on social media (because there ARE benefits, especially as social media continues to fracture), they remain clearly labelled and don't pretend to be 'human'. I really like the way Mastodon labels automated or bot accounts, I think this should be utilised on more platforms.